Violence Within Yanomamo Culture
In western culture, there are normally laws against homicide in any form, with varying degrees of punishment usually involving prison time. In Yanomamo culture, there are no official laws regarding killing, and revenge killing is an expected form of retaliation. When conflict arises in Yanomamo culture, it is normally resolved through a series of practices with increasing lethality. These include shouting matches; chest pounding and side slapping duels; fights with club, axes, or machetes; and lastly shooting with bows and arrows with an attempt to kill. Once someone is killed in a dispute, it is expected that their kin will enact a revenge killing against that person and their respective group. If this killing does not take place, it can have negative effects, such as a view of cowardice regarding the kinsmen of the person killed, which can signify the kinsmen, or the entire group, as weak, making them more vulnerable to future raids or other affronts.
Revenge killing is expressed in Yanomamo culture by a group of men, usually 10-20, conducting a raid on another Yanomamo tribe. This is done to avenge a member of kin that has been killed by a member of the tribe being raided. Usually these disputes occur over women in the tribe, leading to an act of violence, killing a man and fracturing the tribe into respective groups. This revenge killing is usually taken up by male kin of whomever was killed.
Being unokais appears to have many cultural benefits. These include being statistically more successful in finding a mate as well as higher rates of reproductive success than their non-unokais counterparts. This can be due to a unokais having the opportunity to appropriate mates from other groups, or because they appear more attractive to potential marital partners. The benefits of being a non-unokais would primarily consist of the safety that comes from not taking on raids and revenge killings. However, non-unokais are often culturally shamed for possessing cowardice, which can make them more vulnerable to mistreatment.
The political structure of the Yanomamo is uncentralized, allowing them to process disputes between tribes and internally without the influence or laws of outside government. This structure allows for revenge killing because the Yanomamo view vengeance as a justified reason for killing. Yanomamo tribes also have headmen. The headman has usually already committed a revenge killing, and has a large number of kin members that he is related to, perpetuating this cycle.
The Yanomamo often have social groups divided by gender, with a major group being men connected by the practice of being unokais. While the Yanomamo are a relatively egalitarian society, they still have some hierarchy between genders as well as between a headman and the rest of the tribe. Revenge killing is also one way to either increase or preserve social status within the culture.
The Yanomamo place a lot of value on kinship, and their tribes and smaller groups are organized by kinship. Oftentimes the basis of revenge killing is kinship, with kinsmen being expected to avenge their relative. The groups that form as a result of many of these revenge killings or other slights are usually direct kin, with any consanguineal kin separated from the rest of their group by marriage resulting in more complicated social responses to these killings.
One of the most common disputes that leads to revenge killings is over women and accused infidelity. Men that are unokais also often have more success finding marital partners as well as reproducing. This may be because unokais have more access to women in the community, or are more appealing due to their status.
Although killing is thought of as bad or at least undesirable in most cultures, Yanomamo culture is a prime example of how it can be used for power, social status, and control. At the heart, revenge killings are about retribution. In cultures that have laws against murder, retribution can be reached through different pathways, such as imprisonment of an individual that has done harm. Laws allow the general society to achieve a sense of justice without having to wield their own power or seek personal revenge. Instead, the power of the state is enacted. While there are many downsides to many legal systems around the world, taking the power out of the individual’s hands is an effective way to stop the violent cycle of personal revenge.
You lost your wrap function on your post, which makes it difficult to review. Make sure you check your post after you publish to catch mistakes like this and correct them. For now, I will copy your post below so that others can read it:
ReplyDelete_______________________________________________
In western culture, there are normally laws against homicide in any form, with varying degrees of punishment usually involving prison time. In Yanomamo culture, there are no official laws regarding killing, and revenge killing is an expected form of retaliation. When conflict arises in Yanomamo culture, it is normally resolved through a series of practices with increasing lethality. These include shouting matches; chest pounding and side slapping duels; fights with club, axes, or machetes; and lastly shooting with bows and arrows with an attempt to kill. Once someone is killed in a dispute, it is expected that their kin will enact a revenge killing against that person and their respective group. If this killing does not take place, it can have negative effects, such as a view of cowardice regarding the kinsmen of the person killed, which can signify the kinsmen, or the entire group, as weak, making them more vulnerable to future raids or other affronts.
Revenge killing is expressed in Yanomamo culture by a group of men, usually 10-20, conducting a raid on another Yanomamo tribe. This is done to avenge a member of kin that has been killed by a member of the tribe being raided. Usually these disputes occur over women in the tribe, leading to an act of violence, killing a man and fracturing the tribe into respective groups. This revenge killing is usually taken up by male kin of whomever was killed.
Being unokais appears to have many cultural benefits. These include being statistically more successful in finding a mate as well as higher rates of reproductive success than their non-unokais counterparts. This can be due to a unokais having the opportunity to appropriate mates from other groups, or because they appear more attractive to potential marital partners. The benefits of being a non-unokais would primarily consist of the safety that comes from not taking on raids and revenge killings. However, non-unokais are often culturally shamed for possessing cowardice, which can make them more vulnerable to mistreatment.
The political structure of the Yanomamo is uncentralized, allowing them to process disputes between tribes and internally without the influence or laws of outside government. This structure allows for revenge killing because the Yanomamo view vengeance as a justified reason for killing. Yanomamo tribes also have headmen. The headman has usually already committed a revenge killing, and has a large number of kin members that he is related to, perpetuating this cycle.
The Yanomamo often have social groups divided by gender, with a major group being men connected by the practice of being unokais. While the Yanomamo are a relatively egalitarian society, they still have some hierarchy between genders as well as between a headman and the rest of the tribe. Revenge killing is also one way to either increase or preserve social status within the culture.
The Yanomamo place a lot of value on kinship, and their tribes and smaller groups are organized by kinship. Oftentimes the basis of revenge killing is kinship, with kinsmen being expected to avenge their relative. The groups that form as a result of many of these revenge killings or other slights are usually direct kin, with any consanguineal kin separated from the rest of their group by marriage resulting in more complicated social responses to these killings.
One of the most common disputes that leads to revenge killings is over women and accused infidelity. Men that are unokais also often have more success finding marital partners as well as reproducing. This may be because unokais have more access to women in the community, or are more appealing due to their status.
Although killing is thought of as bad or at least undesirable in most cultures, Yanomamo culture is a prime example of how it can be used for power, social status, and control. At the heart, revenge killings are about retribution. In cultures that have laws against murder, retribution can be reached through different pathways, such as imprisonment of an individual that has done harm. Laws allow the general society to achieve a sense of justice without having to wield their own power or seek personal revenge. Instead, the power of the state is enacted. While there are many downsides to many legal systems around the world, taking the power out of the individual’s hands is an effective way to stop the violent cycle of personal revenge.
DeleteMy feedback:
ReplyDelete________________
1. (4/5) - "In Yanomamo culture, there are no official laws regarding killing, and revenge killing is an expected form of retaliation. "
What do you mean by "official"? What is required for a law to be "official"? The system of revenge killings is a recognized system of justice that responds to those killing for personal gain by punishing the perpetrator by killing them in return. It may be different from ours and doesn't meet your definition of "official", but it is still a system of justice.
2. (5/5) - Good description. Do women play any role in these raids?
3. (10/10) - Very good. I appreciate that you worked to identify benefits for either role, unokais or non-unokais.
4.
Political structure (4/4): "The political structure of the Yanomamo is uncentralized"
This has been a common point made by students, but this isn't that different from each town in the US having their own police force and court system. Missing is the higher federal court system (which is certainly "centralized") but given the differences in population size, would it be possible to produce this type of centralization with the Yanomamo?
Otherwise, good in this section.
Social status/organization (4/4): "Revenge killing is also one way to either increase or preserve social status within the culture."
This is closest to what I was looking for here, but can we expand? A man (or a woman) can increase their social status by taking part in revenge killing (and lose social status by refusing to do so). Likewise, a woman can gain social status by marrying a successful unokais.
Kinship (2/4): You explain how kinship influences the unokais system, but what about the other way around? How does the unokais system impact a person's kinship system? This system of killings works to give high status unokais a larger system of kin, through marriage, tying the population together. Women can also expand their kin group by choosing to be a second (or third) wife to a successful unokai, marrying into an already large kin group.
Marriage and reproduction (4/4): Good. Women can also improve their reproductive success by marrying a successful unokais warrior, gaining greater protection against illegal raids and better access to resources for herself and her children.
5. (10/10) -- "Laws allow the general society to achieve a sense of justice without having to wield their own power or seek personal revenge."
This is true but evades the key question here of why we need the laws to begin with against behaviors no one should want to do. You come closer here with this earlier comment:
"Yanomamo culture is a prime example of how it can be used for power, social status, and control."
So individuals in this culture can *benefit* from killing? Could that be why we need the laws?
Both Western cultures and the Yanomamo have laws against these behaviors, not because they are bad but because people may gain some benefit from engaging in those laws to the detriment of those around them.
We are creatures of biology, regardless of how "civilized" we might want to think we are. Killing can benefit an organism if they gain resources or a mate or defend their offspring in the process, correct? So that benefit is still there in humans, whether we like it or not. Killing is an instinctive, biological reaction to a threat of some sort, to our lives, to our family (genes) or to our resources, but it can also be a strategy to advance your survival, such as (for example) killing off a rival. Understand that this isn't excusing the behavior. It just explains it. But we need laws against this behavior, not because no one wants to do it but because sometimes people can benefit from this behavior... i.e., they DO want to kill because it benefits them. Laws protect us from selfish actions of others, acting to their own benefit and the harm of others.
Prompt #5 should have read "5. (9/10)" with a one point deduction.
DeleteHey Jessica, There are so many different ways to engage in violence within this culture. They have a choice of many different types of weapons and battles. Not only does their culture encourage killing in the correct circumstances they also have gender norms where men are meant to fight for women and honor. I believe that having a less strict law system changes the behavior and attitude toward killing. strangely enough killing seems to help peoples social standing and can even improve their life by helping them find a partner and even gain more respect among the community. I agree that we need laws to create an environment where everyone feels safe and can be judged on skills that don't relate to killing.
ReplyDeleteYour post really helped me understand how different the Yanomamo view of justice is from what we’re used to. I thought it was especially interesting how being an unokai brings both social status and real danger it’s such a different kind of trade-off compared to what we see in Western societies. You made a great point about how laws, for all their flaws, help prevent that ongoing cycle of violence.
ReplyDeleteYou explained the Yanomamo culture really well, especially how revenge killing is tied to family, respect, and power in their group. It was also interesting how you compared it to laws in other places like the U.S. Do you think the rewards that unokais get, like being more likely to get married and have kids, make the danger of revenge killing seem worth it to them?
ReplyDelete