The Lascaux Caves Paintings
There are many different things that artists of these cave painting could have been trying to express. They could be an illustration of animals that these people often hunted and were integral to survival, or animals that have a particular significance spiritually or in this cultures mythos. It is also possible that the signs and signals painted have meanings we have yet to uncover, such as how certain symbols are used to convey kinship in other cultures. These paintings could be used as a documentation of history and a means of education for younger generations. Lastly, they could be simply for the sake of expression, experimentation, or enhancing the world around them.
One reason that there are more animals than humans depicted in these cave paintings could be because animals played a larger role in life for those living in this time period. Many people during this time were foragers, relying on hunting for a good portion of their sustenance. Animals were also often the direct cause of migration patters, with groups of foragers following their game. Animal products such as hides and bones were also important in the making of tools, shelter, and other items often integral to cultures.
These paintings can tell us about the animals that these people often encountered, as well as how they were viewed based on their depictions. They can also enlighten us as to the types of tools that were often used, the minerals used to painting, and the level of anatomical knowledge these painters had of both humans and animals.
Some of the difficulties one could encounter while trying to create these painting would be finding and using the pigments that were desired. Another issue for these painter was being able to reach certain parts of the cave, such as the ceiling, to paint them safely. Cave walls also often have texture that can be difficult to paint over for various reasons, often affecting the tools painters would use to create the desired image.
One possible function of this art is the documentation of different animals and practices. A second would be to display religious ideas or spiritual practices. A third would be illustrating myths or legends through these images.
One similarity to modern art is through writing. Whether poetry, fiction, history, writing helps to document past stories and myths and create new ones. Writing is also very important to many religious theology and practices. Music has a similar way of sharing stories and knowledge, as does painting or dancing. Performance art also, although somewhat less mainstream, is a great outlet to express and make statements about certain beliefs. Many of these cave painting are also making statements about their current world, and are influenced by the painters beliefs.
The art I am presenting is traditional Māori tattooing called tā moko.
For the Māori, tā moko serves as a way to elevate status, celebrate an important milestone, such as childhood to adulthood, and to be seen as more attractive by the opposite sex. Many of the symbols are also universal to Māori, and some incredibly personal, allowing them to convey a story through tā moko.
The culture surrounding tā moko includes the cultural interpretation of the symbols being tattooed. In a way, these symbols and motifs are their own language. Since these tattoos are so meaningful, they often reflect what a person has done in their life, and are not taken lightly. Traditionally moko is carved using a uhi, a type of chisel.
One of the ways tā moko benefits Māori society is by emphasizing the value of kinship and family bonds, often reflected in moko motifs. It can also benefit a single person by elevating their social status and making them more desirable. Another positive is the ability of tā moko to document stories and history on the skin. One of the downsides of tā moko is the healing process. Although modern practices of tā moko encourage healthier healing, traditionally the practice and healing process can be quite painful and carry and risk of infection.

I liked how you explained why animals were such a big part of the cave art. Your part about ta moko was really interesting too I didn’t know the tattoos told personal stories. Do people still use the traditional tools , or do they use modern ones now?
ReplyDeleteSection 1:
ReplyDeletea. Message (4/5) - Okay, but perhaps we need to figure out *who* was the target of their message? Themselves? Future generations of this population? Other human groups? It is easier to figure out what they are saying when you figure out who they are talking to. Consider the fact that hunter gather populations were highly mobile. It is possible that these paintings were intended to provide information or when the population returned to the site later.
b. Animals (5/5) - Good. I think considering the issue of "importance" is an point, particularly with your point on migration. These populations would have been rotating to different seasonal locations and may not return to this location for a while. Having this record of animals they hunted would have helped them be more successful. It wasn't important for them to know what humans looked like. It WAS important to know about the animals.
c. Other aspects of culture (4/5) - Okay, but think about the different concepts we have covered in this class. Does it tell anything interesting about any aspect of their culture? For example, this really only tells us about creatures seen when hunting, correct? There are no berries, no mushrooms, no birds, no fish and no eggs, things that would be part of the "gathering" process. So who is painting this pictures, men or women? Does that tell us anything about the gender roles of this culture?
d. Difficulties (4/5) - Good but missing a key difficulty. These caves were very dark! The artists would have had to create some source of lighting to complete these paintings.
e. Functions (5/5) - To answer this, we need to keep in mind how costly these images were to create. The artists had to create the pigments and tools, crawl deep into dangerous caves, avoid dangerous animals, light the walls, access the walls (which were often very high) and then produce the images. This also was costly in terms time lost to other activities, such as hunting for food and protecting the community from danger. The function/benefit would need to balance this cost.
I can see how documentation/record keeping could be beneficial to the future population. How would representing myths or spirituality benefit the population in a way that balanced the high costs? What about more concrete functions such recording historical events and for educational purposes (such as teaching young hunters)?
A caution on the issue of "spirituality": Do we really need to opt for a religious function here? What evidence do we have for that? I know that the original researchers claimed a religious function, but later researchers opposed that jump in logic, which said more about the biases of the researchers than the intent of the paintings.
Are you familiar with the concept of Occam's Razor? It suggests that if simpler explanations work in understanding the function of a behavior or an event, then there is no need to opt for more complex driving forces. This applies here. Do we need to resort to religion and faith and a supreme being to explain the function of these paintings? Or can they be explained by "simpler" concepts, such as gaining resources, survival, and teaching future generations about these herds? This doesn't rule out a religious explanation, but recognizes this just raises more questions... such as where is the evidence that it IS religious in nature. We can't just assume that.
Section 2: (6/10) - "One similarity to modern art is through writing. " -- I'm not sure I understand the intent here. The idea is to look for commonalities in function between this ancient art and modern art. This ancient population didn't have a system of writing so this wouldn't apply here.
Check my response to the last question. Does modern art also have similar functions in terms of story-telling, record keeping and education?
Section 3:
DeleteImage (5/5) - Great example! Very unique.
a. Function (5/5) - Good.
b. Culture (4/5) - What about the culture of creating these tattoos? The artists themselves would have had an important role in this culture. How did they learn their craft? Did they carry authority? I would have liked to more about this aspect of the tattoo culture.
c. Cost/Benefit (5/5) - Good. It is interesting to translate the importance of tattoos within this culture to our own, which has certainly evolved over time, hasn't it? Used to be that tattoos were looked on as "low" in status (which would have been a cost) but now it has become an important form of self-expression and artistic status.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI like explanation for the similarities of the purpose of modern art and the cave paintings. I was aware of the Maori tattoos, however I didn't consider that infections from traditional methods of tattooing might be a negative effect, however that makes sense.
ReplyDelete